../../images/nielsenr.png
Rodney D. Nielsen
Research Scientist
Research Assistant Professor
Assistant Professor Adjunct
Boulder Language Technologies
University of Denver
University of Colorado at Boulder
../../images/cu_email.png
CSCI 5622-002 Machine Learning, Fall 2009
Tentative Syllabus

DATE TOPIC READ ASSIGNMENT DUE
Mon 24-Aug Course Goals & ML Overview 1
Wed 26-Aug ML Overview & Experimental Design 2 slides
SUPERVISED LEARNING
Mon 31-Aug Decision Trees & Experimental Des 3 slides
Wed 2-Sep ML Methods cont. 5 TM slides
Mon 7-Sep Labor Day
Wed 9-Sep Probability Theory & Bayesian Learning 6 slides Problem Proposal
Mon 14-Sep Linear regression & classification TM ML
slides
Wed 16-Sep Perceptron and Neural Networks 4 slides Full Proposal
Mon 21-Sep Neural Networks cont. 4 slides Peer Feedback (Pr Fdbk)
Wed 23-Sep Instance-based learning 8 slides Literature Review Plan
Mon 28-Sep Support Vector Machines CB SVMs
NC SVMs
slides
Wed 30-Sep Kernel methods NC Kernels
Text Krnls
slides
Lit Rev Notes Papers 1-2
COMPUTATIONAL LEARNING THEORY
Mon 5-Oct Computational Learning Theory 7 slides
Wed 7-Oct Computational Learning Theory 7 Lit Rev Notes Papers 3-4
ENSEMBLE METHODS
Mon 12-Oct Ensemble methods Bagging
Boosting
slides
Experiment (Exp) 1 Plan
Wed 14-Oct Ensemble methods Stacking
Random Forests
slides
Literature Review
Begin Exp 1
UNSUPERVISED LEARNING
Mon 19-Oct Hierarchical Aglomerative clustering ESL 14.3.12
Foundations of
Statistical NLP
14.-14.1
slides
Pr Fdbk: Lit Review
Wed 21-Oct K-means clustering ML 6.12
ESL 14.3.6
slides
Mon 26-Oct Mixture of Gaussians ML 6.12
ESL 6.8 8.5 12.7
Wed 28-Oct Snow Closure
Mon 2-Nov Expectation Maximization ML 6.12
DLR
ESL 8.5
slides
SEMISUPERVISED & ACTIVE LEARNING
Wed 4-Nov Semi-Supervised Learning Co-training
Yarowsky
Nigam
slides
Mon 9-Nov Semi-Supervised Learning Coupling
slides
Experiment 1 Write up
Wed 11-Nov Active Learning Settles
Mon 16-Nov Active Learning Olsson Pr Fdbk: Exp 1 Write up
Wed 18-Nov Online Learning Blum
Mon 23-Nov Fall Break
Wed 25-Nov Fall Break
OTHER TOPICS
Mon 30-Nov Dimensionality Reduction Ftr Sel Guyon
PCA Ghodsi
Wed 2-Dec Topic Modeling Steyvers
slides
Draft Paper (to Pr grp)
Mon 7-Dec Sequence learning HMMs Boyle
HMMs Rabiner
slides
Pr Fdbk: Draft Paper
Wed 9-Dec Reinforcement Learning 13 slides
Mitchell slides
WRAP-UP TERM PROJECTS
Fri 11-Dec No meeting Final Paper (to me)
Wed 16-Dec
4:00PM
1777 Exposition Dr., Conf. Room 102 at entry Class Presentations

Assignments: Please submit all assignments on the schedule to me and everyone in your peer group.

Peer Review: Please provide as much constructive feedback as possible to your peers. As the semester progresses, I anticipate that many of you will help to substantially improve your peers' papers. Peer reviews should be submitted to authors every Monday following any prior week's deadline, even if the peer feedback is not explicitly mentioned in the schedule. Only if the peer review is explicitly listed on the schedule above, submit the review to me as well as to the author. These are also the only assignments I will be reviewing in detail.

Grading your peer reviews: Only when a peer review is listed on the schedule, please gave a single grade for all of the related reviews your peers give you on a scale from 0 to 10 (e.g., at Pr Fdbk: Lit Review grade all the feedback a peer gave you related to the literature review - the plan, the paper notes, and the final review):
10=A: excellent feedback, the review(s) could have a significant impact on my project
9=A: better than expected feedback, the review(s) really helped me with my project
8=B: good feedback, the review(s) helped me fine-tune my project
7=C: okay feedback, the review(s) might be a helpful
6=D: weak feedback, the review(s) are unlikely to be helpful, but they tried
0-5=F: poor feedback, the review(s) will not really have any impact on my project

Please do not grade reviews based on spelling, grammar, tact, or flattery, (but feel free to discuss those issues with reviewers). Grade the reviews by how much you think the feedback will positively affect your learning, your research project, and the likelihood your paper will be accepted by a conference or journal, relative to how much you think a peer should be able to affect those issues. When you submit assignments, please let the reviewers know if you'd like them to focus on something specific in their review.

If you give 2 or all 3 of your reviews the same score, please rank all of them to indicate which reviews you felt were the most helpful.

Send the grades and rankings to me, no later then one week after the review's deadline. I will combine the scores from all peers and determine the final grade.

Please try to give your colleagues the best possible feedback and remember that peer reviews will account for 20% of your final grade and much of this grade will be determined by the reviewee/peer.